![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
crowgirlbThe Philadelphia Inquirer has a good editorial today about the issue of teaching Intelligent Design.
To synopsize (is that a word?) they recommend that the idea of creationism be mentioned as "a valid way to look at the world" but that it should not be taught as science, nor should it be set in opposition to science. Well, read the editorial if you're interested, I'm not summarizing well.
To synopsize (is that a word?) they recommend that the idea of creationism be mentioned as "a valid way to look at the world" but that it should not be taught as science, nor should it be set in opposition to science. Well, read the editorial if you're interested, I'm not summarizing well.
